Sentiment Analysis in the News

By A. Balahur, Ralf Steinberger, Mijail Alexandrov Kabadjov, Vanni Zavarella, E. V. D. Goot, Matina Halkia, Bruno Pouliquen, Jenya Belyaeva. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2010

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent years have brought a significant growth in the volume of research in sentiment analysis, mostly on highly subjective text types (movie or product reviews). The main difference these texts have with news articles is that their target is clearly defined and unique across the text. Following different annotation efforts and the analysis of the issues encountered, we realised that news opinion mining is different from that of other text types. We identified three subtasks that need to be addressed: definition of the target; separation of the good and bad news content from the good and bad sentiment expressed on the target; and analysis of clearly marked opinion that is expressed explicitly, not needing interpretation or the use of world knowledge. Furthermore, we distinguish three different possible views on newspaper articles ― author, reader and text, which have to be addressed differently at the time of analysing sentiment. Given these definitions, we present work on mining opinions about entities in English language news, in which we apply these concepts. Results showed that this idea is more appropriate in the context of news opinion mining and that the approaches taking this into consideration produce a better performance.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/996978a9fe73a34906f2187301f0a0334cced862

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mike Thelwall
  2. Georgios Paltoglou
  3. Maximilian Idahl
  4. Yongwei Yang
  5. Mahnaz Koupaee
  6. Kevan Buckley
  7. Ho‐Jin Choi
  8. Richard Sicoli

Citations in the corpus