The risky situation: a procedure for assessing the father–child activation relationship

By D. Paquette, M. Bigras. 2010

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/995c22518d32a01026753195e1e518b0c140f508

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Fagan
2. S. Schoppe-Sullivan
3. Caroline Dumont
4. D. Paquette
5. J. Baxter
6. D. Smart

In Demography

1. S. Schoppe-Sullivan
2. J. Fagan
3. Caroline Dumont
4. D. Paquette

In Social Psychology

1. S. Schoppe-Sullivan
2. J. Fagan
3. Caroline Dumont
4. D. Paquette
5. J. Baxter
6. D. Smart

Citations in the corpus

• The Role of Psychological Safety in Human Development (2016, unknown): “For young children, this might be an unwillingness to explore in new play situations (Paquette & Bigras, 2010).”
• What about the child's tie to the father? A new insight into fathering, father–child attachment, children's socio-emotional development and the activation relationship theory (2013, methodology): “Paquette and Bigras (2010) have already suggested that activation would have less impact on children when fathers are more involved in caregiving activities.”
• The Evolution of Fathering Research in the 21st Century: Persistent Challenges, New Directions (2020, background): “Paquette (2004, p. 194) termed the father–child attachment an “activation relationship,” and Paquette and Bigras (2010) developed a new assessment, the Risky Situation, as an alternative to the Strange Situation Procedure (the gold standard measure of attachment behavior in infancy), with the aim…”
• A longitudinal study of father-to-infant attachment: antecedents and correlates (2013, background): “RS classification has been shown to be independent of SSP classification (Paquette & Bigras, 2010).”