At-a-site variation and minimum flow resistance for mountain rivers

By J. Bathurst. 2002

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Ecology, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9945ca9f26763ecfcb5641a932211bbac2b48635

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. R. Ferguson
2. Keith Beven
3. Jens Christian Refsgaard
4. J. P. van der Sluijs
5. Ion Iorgulescu

In Ecology

1. R. Ferguson
2. Keith Beven

In Soil Science

1. R. Ferguson
2. Keith Beven

Citations in the corpus

• Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations (2005, background): “Therefore, the focus of this study is an evaluation of the uncertainty of the roughness coefficients which is also driven by the fact that many modellers see the main problem in practical applications as a problem of choosing the ‘correct’ roughness (Barr and Das, 1986; Bathurst, 2002; Boss Internat”
• Flow resistance equations for gravel‐ and boulder‐bed streams (2007, methodology): “The equations of Rickenmann [1991], Bathurst [2002] , Smart et al. [2002], and Katul et al. [2002] are therefore not considered.”