HINDSIGHT BIAS IN LEGAL DECISION MAKING

By Erin M. Harley. 2007

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Pharmacy, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/992f5a128b8f7e99a0c921553323bf39ce71e91c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Jane Goodman-Delahunty
2. Pär Anders Granhag
3. Maria Hartwig
4. Elizabeth F. Loftus

In Pharmacy

1. Maria Hartwig

In Social Psychology

1. Pär Anders Granhag
2. Maria Hartwig
3. Elizabeth F. Loftus
4. Aldert Vrij
5. R. Fisher
6. Leif A. Strömwall
7. H. Blank
8. S. Porter

Citations in the corpus

• INSIGHTFUL OR WISHFUL: Lawyers' Ability to Predict Case Outcomes (2010, background): “Failure of lawyers to make proper predictions can impair settlement and litigation performance (Harley, 2007).”