Training Deep Networks without Learning Rates Through Coin Betting
By Francesco Orabona, Tatiana Tommasi. 2017
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Issam Hadj Laradji
- Gauthier Gidel
- Sharan Vaswani
- Nicolas Loizou
- Peter Richtárik
- Mark W. Schmidt
- Francesco Orabona
Citations in the corpus
- Painless Stochastic Gradient: Interpolation, Line-Search, and Convergence Rates (2019, methodology): “We compare our methods against Adam [39], which is the most common adaptive method, and other methods that report better performance than Adam: coin-betting [60], L41 [68], and Adabound [51].”
- A Modern Introduction to Online Learning (2019, methodology): “Recently, the same approach with a special coin-betting algorithm was also used for optimization of deep neural networks [Orabona and Tommasi, 2017].”
- Estimating means of bounded random variables by betting (2020, methodology): “5 Online Newton Step (ONS-m) Betting algorithms play an essential role in online learning as several optimization problems can be framed in terms of coin-betting games [47, 48, 49, 23].”
- Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current Status and Future Directions (2019, methodology): “The implementation used in this research is the default implementation of peephole connections in the Tensorflow framework.”