On one-loop correction to energy of spinning strings in S**5
By S. Frolov, I. Park, A. Tseytlin. 2004
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We revisit the computation of the 1-loop AdS{sub 5}xS{sup 5} superstring sigma model correction to the energy of a closed circular string rotating in S{sup 5}. The string is spinning around its center of mass with two equal angular momenta J{sub 2}=J{sub 3} and its center of mass angular momentum is J{sub 1}. We revise the argument that the 1-loop correction is suppressed by (1/J) factor [J=J{sub 1}+2J{sub 2} is the total SO(6) spin] relative to the classical ({lambda}J{sub 2}/J{sup 2}) term in the energy and use numerical methods to compute the leading 1-loop coefficient. The corresponding gauge-theory result is known only in the J{sub 1}=0 limit when the string solution becomes unstable and thus the 1-loop shift of the energy formally contains an imaginary part. While the comparison with gauge-theory may not be well defined in this case, our numerical string-theory value of the 1-loop coefficient seems to disagree with the gauge-theory one. A plausible explanation should be in the different order of limits taken on the gauge-theory and the string-theory sides of the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory duality.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98ebbefe2ebf61c0364a363daddbaa33ef49db34
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Long-range psu(2,2|4) Bethe Ansatze for gauge theory and strings (2005, background): “While particle annihilation and production are often believed to destroy integrability, here the number of excitations is actually preserved by the flavor change: This is related to the above claim that a combination of the two excitations Z → U and Z → U̇ is equivalent to the double excitation Z →…”
- Semiclassical quantization of spinning strings in AdS4 × ℂℙ3 (2008, background): “An important tool to investigate the question about quantum integrability is provided by semiclassical quantization of rigid string solutions [18, 19].”
- Integrable Hamiltonian for Classical Strings on AdS5 x S5 (2004, background): “Moreover, results of [26, 27] indicate that 1/L corrections for spinning strings would disagree already at the oneloop level.”
- Logarithmic corrections to higher twist scaling at strong coupling from AdS/CFT (2006, background): “As was found in [26] on the examples of circular solutions in SL(2) [41] and SU(2) [40] sectors(11) the non-analytic λ correction in the string 1-loop energy should universally account for the difference between the string and gauge predictions for the coefficient of the λ(3) term, corresponding to ”
- Semiclassical Strings and AdS/CFT (2004, methodology): “mass expansion is well-defined and the quantum corrections should be proportional to positive powers of ˜ λ. This was explicitly demonstrated by a 1-loop computation in [36, 66 ].”
- Spinning strings in AdS5 × S5: one-loop correction to energy in SL(2) sector (2005, methodology): “One may think, of course, that there is no a priori reason to expect the exact agreement, and, as in [8, 17, 26], any disagreement should be attributed to the different order of limits taken on the gauge theory and the string theory sides of the AdS/CFT duality.”
- Quantum corrections to the string Bethe ansatz (2006, methodology): “For the SU(2) case, with k = 2m, we have [24, 25, 18]”
- The AdS5xS5 Superstring in Light-Cone Gauge and its Bethe Equations (2006, background): “Review of the Superstring on AdS5 × S5 6 2.1 Superalgebra psu(2, 2|4) 7 2.2 Lagrangian and Coset Element 9”
- Classical/quantum integrability in non-compact sector of AdS/CFT (2004, methodology): “The Bethe ansatz solution of this model and related spin systems was extremely useful in comparing anomalous dimensions of local operators in SYM [16, 17, 18] to the energies of classical string solitons in AdS5 × S5 [19, 20, 21, 22].”