Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: Effects of input frequencies, lexical items, and discourse function (2010, background): “…constructions in English, which suggest that young English-speaking children have a stronger representation of complement-clause constructions with high-frequency CTVs than complement-clause constructions with low-frequency CTVs (Dąbrowska et al. 2009, Diessel & Tomasello 2001, Kidd et al. 2006).”
The nature of generalization in language (2009, background): “…range of words or meanings (Brenier and Michaelis to appear; Cameron-Faulkner et al. 2003; Deane 2003; Diessel 2001; Goldberg 1996, 1998; Hunston and Francis 1999; Kidd et al. 2006; Schmidt and Ungerer 2002; Sethuraman 2002; Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003; Thompson and Hopper 2001; Zwicky 2002).”