Effect of magnetite particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate

By S. Yean, L. Cong, C. Yavuz, J. Mayo, William W. Yu, A. Kan, V. Colvin, M. Tomson. 2005

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98cae0cd8b5517e88cf77a345462e484e23516ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Guangming Zeng
2. I. Tyagi
3. Hamidreza Sadegh
4. S. Tang
5. Jilai Gong
6. Wangwang Tang
7. I. Lo
8. Jie Liang

In Environmental Chemistry

1. S. Tang
2. I. Lo
3. Guangming Zeng
4. Vinod Kumar Gupta

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Guangming Zeng
2. I. Tyagi
3. Jie Liang
4. Piao Xu
5. Hamidreza Sadegh
6. S. Tang
7. I. Lo
8. Vinod Kumar Gupta

Citations in the corpus

• Preparation and evaluation of a magnetite-doped activated carbon fiber for enhanced arsenic removal (2010, neutral): “An increase in the maximum arsenic adsorption capacity was observed with a decreasing magnetite particle size [16].”
• Magnetic nanoparticles: essential factors for sustainable environmental applications. (2013, background): “Although the capacity increases with decreasing particle size, some researchers reported that the removal capacity normalized by surface area is not much different when the particle size changes (Tratnyek and Johnson, 2006; Yean et al., 2005).”
• Magnetite nanoparticles for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: synthesis and characterization (2013, result): “The results obtained in this work in terms of metal adsorption capacity are of the same order of magnitude of those reported by other authors in the literature on the same sorbent (Wang et al. 2011; Yuan et al. 2009; Boddu et al. 2008; Yean et al. 2005).”
• Impact of humic/fulvic acid on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using nanomaterials: a review. (2014, background): “, 2002), Fe3O4 (Yean et al., 2005; Shipley et al., 2010) and goethite (α-FeOOH) (Grafe et al.”
• Functional Oxide Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Dyes (2013, background): “Many of these reports deal with the influence of different parameters on the removal of metal ions by Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles [43-46].”
• Nanoparticles as Adsorbent; A Positive Approach for Removal of Noxious Metal Ions: A Review (2015, methodology): “In comparison to bare Fe3O4 nanoparticles, surface functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been extensively used for the removal of heavy metal ions (Gupta et al., 2014a; Feng et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2015, 2013b; Xu et al., 2008; Yean et al., 2005; Ozmen et al., 2010; Ge et al., 2012).”
• High-performance iron oxide-graphene oxide nanocomposite adsorbents for arsenic removal (2017, result): “18 g cm) [10], the crystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the iron oxide control sample have an estimated average diameter of 16 nm, which is nearly identical to the average size estimated above from XRD or TEM.”