Modelling the coincident observation of a high-energy neutrino and a bright blazar flare

By Shan Gao, A. Fedynitch, Walter Winter, M. Pohl. Nature Astronomy, 2018

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In September 2017, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory recorded a very-high-energy neutrino in directional coincidence with a blazar in an unusually bright gamma-ray state, TXS0506 + 056 (refs1,2). Blazars are prominent photon sources in the Universe because they harbour a relativistic jet whose radiation is strongly collimated and amplified. High-energy atomic nuclei known as cosmic rays can produce neutrinos; thus, the recent detection may help in identifying the sources of the diffuse neutrino flux3 and the energetic cosmic rays. Here we report a self-consistent analysis of the physical relation between the observed neutrino and the blazar, in particular the time evolution and spectral behaviour of neutrino and photon emission. We demonstrate that a moderate enhancement in the number of cosmic rays during the flare can yield a very strong increase in the neutrino flux, which is limited by co-produced hard X-rays and teraelectronvolt gamma rays. We also test typical radiation models4,5 for compatibility and identify several model classes6,7 as incompatible with the observations. We investigate to what degree the findings can be generalized to the entire population of blazars, determine the relation between their output in photons, neutrinos and cosmic rays, and suggest how to optimize the strategy of future observations.With a lepto-hadronic jet model and recent multi-messenger data, it is shown that a moderate enhancement in cosmic rays during a blazar flare can yield an increased neutrino flux, which is limited by co-produced hard X-rays and TeV gamma rays.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98bb49ff239d29c8506f4c20305cab8b880ac980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. W. Rhode
  2. S. Boser
  3. T. Kintscher
  4. Thomas K. Gaisser
  5. D. Soldin
  6. Anna Franckowiak
  7. T. Katori
  8. Tim Huege

Citations in the corpus