Trafficking Fraudulent Accounts: The Role of the Underground Market in Twitter Spam and Abuse
By Kurt Thomas, Damon McCoy, Chris Grier, A. Kolcz, Vern Paxson. 2013
299 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Binghui Wang
- Neil Zhenqiang Gong
- Minghong Fang
- Le Zhang
- Jinyuan Jia
- Stefano Cresci
- Krishna P. Gummadi
- Jacopo Castellini
Citations in the corpus
- Poisoning Attacks to Graph-Based Recommender Systems (2018, background): “[29] found that a half of compromised machines under an aacker’s control maintain less than 10 fake users in online social networks.”
- The Paradigm-Shift of Social Spambots: Evidence, Theories, and Tools for the Arms Race (2017, background): “Moreover, the plague of such spammers and bots leads to an ingenious and lucrative “underground economy”, where account vendors, their customers, and oblivious victims play a piece staging since the very introduction of social networks [34, 36, 38].”
- EVILCOHORT: Detecting Communities of Malicious Accounts on Online Services (2015, background): “On the other hand, E VIL C OHORT can detect an account (or an IP address) as malicious even if the account does not post any content on the online service.”
- The Tweets They Are a-Changin: Evolution of Twitter Users and Behavior (2014, background): “We further observe a dramatic increase in the percentage of suspended users, with over 6% of the entire Twitter user population suspended by late 2013; this is inline with studies on the rise of malicious activity (Thomas et al. 2013; Yeung 2013 ).”
- Fame for sale: Efficient detection of fake Twitter followers (2015, background): “The authors of [27] monitor prices, availability, and fraud perpetrated by a set of merchants of Twitter accounts over the course of a ten-months period.”
- Strength in Numbers: Robust Tamper Detection in Crowd Computations (2015, background): “These Sybil identities are then profitably used to manipulate crowd-sourced information, such as followers in Twitter [4, 33], reviews in Yelp [3], or content likes in Facebook [2, 35].”
- SybilBlind: Detecting Fake Users in Online Social Networks without Manual Labels (2018, background): “[25] found that a half of compromised hosts under an attacker’s control maintain less than 10 Sybils.”
- Fake Twitter followers detection by denoising autoencoder (2017, background): “Many people try to rapidly gain fame by exploiting this mechanism, buying fake following profiles on these online markets [23], [21], [24], [3], [2].”