Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here?

By Niko Balkenhol, F. Gugerli, Samuel A. Cushman, L. Waits, A. Coulon, J. Arntzen, R. Holderegger, H. Wagner, Participants of the Landscape Genetics Research Agenda Workshop 2007. Landscape Ecology, 2009

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98a3328237f8c81cad51f631649783bcd743915d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Effects of sample size, number of markers, and allelic richness on the detection of spatial genetic pattern (2012, background): “Simulation modelling approaches are particularly valuable to explore the effects of sampling on the detectability of landscape genetic pattern–process relationships, as they allow explicit control over the generating process of gene flow and the sampling design (Balkenhol et al. 2009; Epperson et al”
Scale dependent inference in landscape genetics (2010, unknown): “…to the rich understanding of the scale dependency of landscape pattern analysis with landscape metrics, virtually nothing is known about the sensitivity of landscape genetic analyses to variation in the spatial scale of measurement and analysis (Balkenhol et al. 2009; Segelbarcher et al. 2010).”
Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges (2010, background): “However, much more research is needed to combine the different data, methods and theories in effective and meaningful ways (Storfer et al., 2007; Balkenhol et al., 2009a, 2009b).”
A conceptual framework for the spatial analysis of landscape genetic data (2013, methodology): “Each patch connectivity measure may be calculated for a single environmental factor, or for a resistance surface that integrates multiple factors (Balkenhol et al. 2009b; Foll and Gaggiotti 2006).”
Isolation by environment (2014, background): “…(Nosil et al. 2005; Foll & Gaggiotti 2006; Thorpe et al. 2008), and in the past decade, new fields such as landscape genetics (Storfer et al. 2007; Balkenhol et al. 2009; Wagner & Fortin 2013) have arisen to examine the roles played by ecology and the environment in microevolutionary processes…”
Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? (2010, background): “…such differentiation relative to the landscape (Walker et al. 2007), smaller values from pair-wise population comparisons indicating less differentiation and thereby higher rates of gene flow/dispersal (Arens et al. 2007; see Balkenhol et al. 2009 for future directions for landscape genetics).”
Amphibian decline, pond loss and reduced population connectivity under agricultural intensification over a 38 year period (2017, background): “6; Table 3), is a point made previously by Balkenhol et al. (2009) (see also Janin et al. 2009; Cushman et al. 2013).”
Landscape genetics: where are we now? (2010, methodology): “Storfer et al. (2007), Balkenhol et al. (2009a) and Guillot et al. (2009) give overviews on a variety of alternative approaches for landscape genetic analysis and the availability of new landscape genetic simulations software will facilitate further comparisons of alternative methods (Landguth &…”
Estimating effective landscape distances and movement corridors: Comparison of habitat and genetic data (2015, background): “…recently, the field of landscape genetics has shown great potential to provide more rigorous methods to parameterize resistance models by inferring the influences of landscape on realized population connectivity (Spear et al. 2005, Cushman et al. 2006, Storfer et al. 2007, Balkenhol et al. 2009).”
Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho (2010, background): “Many past landscape genetic studies have used relatively simple null-hypothesis testing, such as testing for the presence of a barrier, rather than comparing competing hypotheses involving more complex landscape effects (Holderegger and Wagner 2008; Balkenhol et al. 2009).”
A case for incorporating phylogeography and landscape genetics into species distribution modelling approaches to improve climate adaptation and conservation planning (2010, methodology): “Whilst comprehensive research agendas (Storfer et al., 2007) and potential future directions (Holderegger & Wagner, 2008; Balkenhol et al., 2009) have been published for landscape genetics, the impressive number of studies assessing genetic connectivity using this framework (Balkenhol et al., 2009)…”