De-Confounded Variational Encoder-Decoder for Logical Table-to-Text Generation
By Wenqing Chen, Jidong Tian, Yitian Li, Hao He, Yaohui Jin. 2021
28 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Logical table-to-text generation aims to automatically generate fluent and logically faithful text from tables. The task remains challenging where deep learning models often generated linguistically fluent but logically inconsistent text. The underlying reason may be that deep learning models often capture surface-level spurious correlations rather than the causal relationships between the table \boldsymbol{x} and the sentence \boldsymbol{y}. Specifically, in the training stage, a model can get a low empirical loss without understanding \boldsymbol{x} and use spurious statistical cues instead. In this paper, we propose a de-confounded variational encoder-decoder (DCVED) based on causal intervention, learning the objective p(\boldsymbol{y}|\textrm{do}(\boldsymbol{x})). Firstly, we propose to use variational inference to estimate the confounders in the latent space and cooperate with the causal intervention based on Pearl’s do-calculus to alleviate the spurious correlations. Secondly, to make the latent confounder meaningful, we propose a back-prediction process to predict the not-used entities but linguistically similar to the exactly selected ones. Finally, since our variational model can generate multiple candidates, we train a table-text selector to find out the best candidate sentence for the given table. An extensive set of experiments show that our model outperforms the baselines and achieves new state-of-the-art performance on two logical table-to-text datasets in terms of logical fidelity.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Natural Language Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2022, background): “Multiple terminologies, such as faithfulness [19, 21, 50, 125, 140, 152, 152, 174, 184, 211, 237], factual consistency [17, 18, 23, 163, 167, 210], fidelity [22], factualness4 [154], factuality4 [34], or on the other hand, hallucination [41, 74, 114, 163, 168], fact contradicting [136] are used in t”