Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis
By L. Schueremans, D. Gemert. 2005
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9899d4e639096ae4f8bd0b4172765a9154b9d239
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- A. A. Chojaczyk
- J. Cardoso
- Luis A. C. Neves
- Â. Teixeira
- Rui Li
- Jian Wang
- Victor Picheny
- Carlos Soares
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures (2015, methodology): “Schueremans and Gemert [44] proposed an interesting simulation method based on adaptive ANN model, improved and refined during the reliability analysis.”
- A sequential surrogate method for reliability analysis based on radial basis function (2017, methodology): “The common surrogate models include polynomial response surface method (PRSM) [48-49], radial basis function (RBF) [48-49], Kriging [50-52], support vector regression (SVR) [50-52] and artificial neutral net (ANN) [53].”
- A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models (2013, background): “This problem is selected because it presents a moderate number of random variables and is a classic illustration in the literature [6,10,35,36].”
- LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis (2017, methodology): “Compared with polynomial models, machine learning methods (neural network [21,22], support vector machine (SVM) [23–25], Multi-Layer Perceptrons [26] and so on) are more suitable to matching performance function with highly nonlinear input-output relationships.”
- Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure (2010, methodology): “Echard et al. (2010a,b) used this benchmark to make a comparison among several methods proposed in Schueremans and Gemert (2005), some of which are based on the construction of a response surface.”