The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds

By M. Hemmo. 2002

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, History and Philosophy of Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9891711b5d0fd4e95771bd6f783530e80930ebc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. David Wallace
2. Jeremy Butterfield
3. B. Dainton
4. Gregg Jaeger
5. Maximilian Schlosshauer
6. Lee Smolin

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. David Wallace
2. Jeremy Butterfield
3. B. Dainton
4. John D. Norton
5. Lee Smolin

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. David Wallace
2. Jeremy Butterfield
3. B. Dainton
4. Gregg Jaeger
5. Maximilian Schlosshauer

Citations in the corpus

• The End of Time (2001, background): “And following Bell, Spontaneity has been discussed in that context; (a recent example is Barrett ([1999]), pp.”
• Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory (2004, unknown): “This is also true of both collapse theories [3, 4, 5] and Everett-type interpretations [6, 7].”
• The Phenomenal Self (2008, background): “2), and Barrett (2001). Similar remarks apply to multiple (sub-) universes postulated in ‘inflationary’ cosmological scenarios.”
• Everett and structure (2001, background): “…theories avoid the need to add a preferred basis to the quantum formal- 3This problem is discussed by, for example, Butterfield (1996); see also Barrett (1999), from whom I borrow the “connection rule” terminology. ism, but they do so at the price of requiring a very close connection…”