Phylogeny of the Coleoptera Based on Morphological Characters of Adults and Larvae

By J. Lawrence, A. Ślipiński, A. Seago, M. Thayer, A. Newton, A. Marvaldi. 2011

599 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/988dcd7d235fb69aa36eef26cfcda095131b0717

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Pohl
2. R. Beutel
3. Michael Whiting
4. B. Wiegmann
5. A. Newton
6. D. Mckenna
7. M. Thayer
8. A. Ślipiński

In Paleontology

1. A. Short
2. Michael Whiting
3. A. Vogler
4. R. Meier
5. Alan R. Lemmon
6. E. Lemmon
7. A. Ślipiński
8. D. Mckenna

Citations in the corpus

• The beetle tree of life reveals that Coleoptera survived end‐Permian mass extinction to diversify during the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution (2015, methodology): “In contrast, Lawrence et al. (2011) and Bernhard et al. (2009; except for their Bayesian analysis) failed to recover a monophyletic Hydrophiloidea s.s., instead recovering Histeroidea as sister to part of Hydrophiloidea s.s.; Short & Fikácěk (2013) assumed but did not test the monophyly of…”
• Anchored hybrid enrichment provides new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of longhorned beetles (Cerambycidae) (2018, background): “…1998; Marvaldi et al., 2009), Chrysomeloidea (Reid, 1995; Farrell, 1998; Farrell & Sequeira, 2004; Gómez-Zurita et al., 2007, 2008; Wang et al., 2013), Coleoptera (Hunt et al., 2007; Lawrence et al., 2011; Bocak et al., 2014; McKenna et al., 2015) or even Cerambycidae s.s. (Raje et al., 2016).”
• Insect morphology in the age of phylogenomics: innovative techniques and its future role in systematics (2014, background): “Today, most systematists agree that the morphological characters used in morphology-based or combined analyses should be well documented (e.g. Beetle Tree of Life project (BToL, http://insects.oeb.harvard.edu/ATOL/description .htm); Lawrence et al. 2011).”
• Ultraconserved elements show utility in phylogenetic inference of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and suggest paraphyly of ‘Hydradephaga’ (2017, methodology): “(2002a), in their investigation of Adephaga and recent investigations of the phylogeny of Coleoptera based on morphology (Lawrence et al., 2011) and molecules (Shull et al.”
• Higher‐level phylogeny of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea) inferred from mitochondrial genomes (2020, background): “…2004) while others recovered a paraphyletic Cerambycidae s. s. with inclusion of various combinations of Disteniidae, Megalopodidae, Oxypeltidae, Anoplodermatinae, Orsodacnidae, Vesperinae and even Chrysomelidae (Hunt et al., 2007; Lawrence et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2014; McKenna et al., 2015).”
• Molecular phylogeny, evolution and classification of the Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) (2013, background): “This concept reflects the close relationships of hydrophiloid and histeroid groups revealed by multiple recent morphologybased studies (e.g. Beutel & Komarek, 2004; Beutel & Leschen, 2005; Lawrence et al., 2011).”
• Phylogeny and classification of Cucujoidea and the recognition of a new superfamily Coccinelloidea (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia) (2015, methodology): “The morphological analysis of Lawrence et al. (2011) is the only phylogenetic study to date to not recover a monophyletic CS. Members of the CS family Bothrideridae were recovered in two disparate regions of the topology: Xylariophilus Pal and Lawrence (Xylariophilinae) and Teredolaemus Sharp (Tered”
• The phylogenetic relationships among infraorders and superfamilies of Diptera based on morphological evidence (2013, background): “Lawrence et al. (2011) noted also that a serious challenge in performing ordinal morphological analyses was the inapplicability of many characters in the outgroups.”
• Phylogeny and evolution of Staphyliniformia and Scarabaeiformia: forest litter as a stepping stone for diversification of nonphytophagous beetles (2015, methodology): “Morphological and molecular characters have been used both separately (e.g. Hansen, 1997b; Beutel, 1999; Korte et al., 2004; Beutel & Leschen, 2005; Lawrence et al., 2011) and in combination (e.”
• Building the Coleoptera tree‐of‐life for >8000 species: composition of public DNA data and fit with Linnaean classification (2014, methodology): “vated to a new series Scirtiformia (Lawrence et al., 2011).”