High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: Implications for exercise adherence

By J. Bartlett, G. Close, D. Maclaren, W. Gregson, B. Drust, J. Morton. Jurnal sport science, 2011

624 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Complementary and alternative medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9888a87db586aeccee51b845f22df1af19eb58a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Complementary and alternative medicine

1. M. Gibala
2. J. Little
3. J. Coombes
4. Kassia S. Weston
5. Ulrik Wisløff
6. Martin J. MacInnis

In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

1. M. Gibala
2. J. Hawley
3. Martin J. MacInnis

In Physiology

1. M. Gibala
2. J. Little
3. J. Hawley
4. M. MacDonald

Citations in the corpus

• High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, result): “Bartlett et al 52 found that the ratings of perceived enjoyment after HIIT were higher when compared to MICT.”
• Physiological adaptations to low‐volume, high‐intensity interval training in health and disease (2012, background): “Moreover, recent evidence suggests that HIT is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise (Bartlett et al. 2011).”
• Effects of Physical Exercise on Cognitive Functioning and Wellbeing: Biological and Psychological Benefits (2018, background): “…et al., 2016a,b; [4] Marsh and Sonstroem, 1995; Fox, 2000; Berger and Motl, 2001; Landers and Arent, 2001; Urso and Clarkson, 2003; Craft, 2005; Penedo and Dahn, 2005; Raedeke, 2007; Stessman et al., 2009; Bartlett et al., 2011; Biddle et al., 2011; Rodgers et al., 2014; Zamani Sani et al., 2016.”