Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples

By A. Samani, J. Zubovits, D. Plewes. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2007

717 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9866ab585e9367fde36d8e287ce9e54687efd370

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Marvin M. Doyley
2. Mark L. Palmeri
3. Kathryn Nightingale
4. Mickaël Tanter
5. Mathias Fink

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Marvin M. Doyley
2. Mark L. Palmeri
3. Kathryn Nightingale
4. Mathias Fink
5. Mickaël Tanter

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. Mark L. Palmeri
2. Marvin M. Doyley
3. Kathryn Nightingale
4. Mathias Fink
5. Mickaël Tanter
6. Gregg E. Trahey

Citations in the corpus

• Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem (2012, background): “Elastography is an emerging imaging modality that exploits differences in the biomechanical properties of normal and diseased tissues (Krouskop et al 1998, Samani et al 2007, Sarvazyan et al 1995, Parker et al 2011).”
• WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. (2015, background): “…mechanical measurement of resected breast cancer tissue (DCIS: ductal carcinoma in situ, IDC: invasive ductal carcinoma) showed that its elastic modulus (Young’s modulus) was significantly higher than that of normal glandular tissue (Krouskop et al. 1998; Wellman et al. 1999; Samani et al. 2007).”