The Mean Climate of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM4) in Forced SST and Fully Coupled Experiments

By Richard B. Neale, J. Richter, Sungsu Park, Peter H. Lauritzen, S. Vavrus, Philip J. Rasch, Minghua Zhang. 2013

743 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/984581e2c5bcadf5f6daf27239f7f4f2ed5c02ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Andrew Gettelman
2. J. Golaz
3. R. Garcia
4. V. Larson
5. J. Richter
6. Richard B. Neale
7. Xiaohong Liu
8. Peter M. Caldwell

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Andrew Gettelman
2. J. Golaz
3. V. Larson
4. Richard B. Neale
5. Xiaohong Liu
6. Peter M. Caldwell
7. J. Richter
8. R. Garcia

Citations in the corpus

• Simulation of polar ozone depletion: An update (2015, background): “WACCM4 is a superset of the Community Atmospheric Model, version 4 (CAM4), and includes all of the physical parameterizations of that model [Neale et al., 2013].”
• The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake (2014, methodology): “CAM3 [Collins et al., 2004] is the70 atmospheric component of NCAR’s CCSM3 model; CAM4 uses a newer dynamical core71 and updated deep convection and cloud fraction schemes [Neale et al., 2013]; AM2.”
• Combination Mode Dynamics of the Anomalous Northwest Pacific Anticyclone (2015, methodology): “For all our experiments we use the atmospheric component CAM4 of the Community Earth System Model (CESM) version 1.0.3 (Neale et al. 2013) in a spectral T42 horizontal resolution and 26 vertical levels.”
• An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (2019, methodology): “The CAM lineage used 18 layers in CCM2 (Hack et al., 1993), 27 in CAM3 (Collins et al., 2006), 30 in CAM4 (Neale et al., 2013) and CAM5 and CAM6 has added two extra model layers at the tropopause, but the surface layer has remained constant at approximately 100 m over all these generations.”
• Modification of the Gravity Wave Parameterization in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model: Motivation and Results (2017, methodology): “The version used in this study, WACCM4, is based on the Community Atmosphere Model, version 4 (CAM4; Neale et al. 2013).”
• An Evaluation of the Large‐Scale Atmospheric Circulation and Its Variability in CESM2 and Other CMIP Models (2020, methodology): “This metric has been applied to the geopotential height field in evaluations of previous NCAR models (Collins et al., 2006; Kiehl et al., 1998; Neale et al., 2013), but here we apply it to all spatial fields considered.”
• Development and Validation of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model With Thermosphere and Ionosphere Extension (WACCM‐X 2.0) (2018, neutral): “The physics of these models is described in Marsh et al. (2013) and Neale et al. (2013).”
• Storm track response to ocean fronts in a global high-resolution climate model (2014, methodology): “We employ the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), version 4, a global general circulation model which has been developed for long, stable climate length integrations (Neale et al. 2013). This version uses the Finite Volume dynamical core with a 0.5 horizontal resolution and 26 levels in the vertical (”