The impact of conservation agriculture on smallholder agricultural yields: A scoping review of the evidence
By S. Brouder, H. Gómez-Macpherson. 2014
219 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9837cc867ae2b1dcea1fb7167bebbfd7542246c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Julian Ramirez-Villegas
- A. Khatri-Chhetri
- Pramod K. Aggarwal
- James Hansen
- P. K. Thornton
- J. Pretty
- J. Recha
- Z. Bharucha
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Z. Bharucha
- Julian Ramirez-Villegas
- A. Khatri-Chhetri
- B. Campbell
- James Hansen
- Sophia Huyer
- J. Pretty
- J. Recha
Citations in the corpus
- Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. (2014, background): “Nevertheless, there have been calls for improvements to the evidence-base on CA (Brouder and Gomez-MacPherson, 2014).”
- The climate-smart village approach : framework of an integrative strategy for scaling up adaptation options in agriculture (2018, background): “In some cases, the benefits can only be realized by adopting them together with other technologies (Pittelkow et al. 2014, Brouder and Gomez-Macpherson 2014).”
- When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis (2015, unknown): “In terms of how no-till influences crop productivity, there is litle consensus as to whether yields are maintained or yield increases r decreases can be expected despite these practices being widely nvestigated (Brouder and Gomez-Macpherson, 2014; FAO, 2011; iller et al., 2009).”