Visual saliency detection by spatially weighted dissimilarity
By Lijuan Duan, Chunpeng Wu, Jun Miao, Laiyun Qing, Yu Fu. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sensory Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9820d2e0a54d4b18f5832ef5a3d551c78e54edb4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Ming-Ming Cheng
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Huchuan Lu
- Luc Van Gool
- Ali Borji
- Jianbing Shen
- Wenguan Wang
- Philip H. S. Torr
In Sensory Systems
- Ming-Ming Cheng
- Huchuan Lu
- Ali Borji
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Xiang Ruan
- Lihe Zhang
- Jianbing Shen
- Wenguan Wang
Citations in the corpus
- Exploiting local and global patch rarities for saliency detection (2012, methodology): “Note that the ideas of local and global context have been (separately) considered in the past [44][17] by salient object detection/segmentation approaches, but those have not yet been tested with human fixation prediction, which is the goal of most models (including ours).”
- Saliency Detection on Light Field (2017, unknown): “Bottom-up methods do not require training and rely on low-level features such as color contrast [19], pixel/patch locations [20], histogram [21], etc., for saliency detection.”
- Cluster-based Co-saliency Detection (2013, unknown): “2) Spatial Cue: In human visual system, the regions near the image center draw more attention than the other regions [32]–[34].”
- Saliency Detection via Dense and Sparse Reconstruction (2013, methodology): “We evaluate the proposed algorithm with seventeen state-of-the-art algorithms including IT98 [13], MZ03 [24], LC06 [25], GB06 [10], SR07 [11], AC08 [1], FT09 [2], CA10 [9], RA10 [18], RC11 [7], CB11 [14], SVO11 [6], DW11 [8], SF12 [17], LR12 [19], GS12 [21] and XL13 [22] on three benchmark data sets”
- Global Contrast Based Salient Region Detection (2015, methodology): “In this work, we extensively evaluated our saliency detection method on three different types of benchmark datasets, and compared it against 15 alternate methods — SR [30], IT [17], IM [23], SUN [27], AC [31], SeR [26], AIM [22], GB [29], LC [34], CA [32], FT [33], SWD [28], SEG [25], MSS [24], LP [”
- Saliency filters: Contrast based filtering for salient region detection (2012, background): “While these algorithms are more consistent in terms of global image structures, they suffer from the involved combinatorial complexity, hence they are applicable only to relatively low resolution images, or they need to operate in spaces of reduced dimensionality [10], resulting in loss of small, po”
- Efficient Salient Region Detection with Soft Image Abstraction (2013, methodology): “(a) original (b) IM[39] (c) SeR[45] (d) SUN[52] (e) SEG[43] (f) AIM[8] (g) SWD[20] (h) RC[16] (i) CA[25] (j) MZ[37]”