Representative versus real households in the macro-economic modelling of inequality

By François Bourguignon, A. Robilliard, Sherman Robinson. 2003

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/981294026e9fcdda70da925531a330839d9f5771

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Reimer
2. D. Tarr
3. Thomas W. Hertel
4. A. Yusuf
5. Budy P. Resosudarmo
6. Thomas F. Rutherford
7. Christoph Böhringer
8. Ayşe Uyduranoğlu

In Gender Studies

1. A. Yusuf
2. Budy P. Resosudarmo
3. Thomas F. Rutherford
4. D. Tarr
5. J. Reimer
6. Thomas W. Hertel

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Thomas W. Hertel
2. A. Yusuf
3. Budy P. Resosudarmo
4. Thomas F. Rutherford
5. D. Tarr
6. J. Reimer

Citations in the corpus

• On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: the case of Indonesia (2015, background): “Bourguignon et al. (2005) developed this type of approach for Indonesia.”
• Poverty Effects of Russia’s WTO Accession: Modeling “Real” Households and Endogenous Productivity Effects (2005, methodology): “2 Bourguignon et al. (2002) have developed a procedure for reconciling the micro results and the CGE model results regarding employment choices.”
• Predicting the poverty impacts of trade reform (2004, methodology): “As with Bourguignon et al. (2003), the work of Hertel et al. (2004b) highlights the drawbacks of assuming a common income shift for all households within a given ‘representative group’.”