Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective
By E. Bueren, E. Klijn, J. Koppenjan. 2003
511 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/980b6acd85f40a5f4b00d186d2fa917ece1b9836
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings (2008, unknown): “Th e cross-cutting characteristic means that wicked problems are inescapably connected to other problems, such as environmental preservation and economic development ( Weber 1998, 2003 ), engage confl icting values, such as homeland security and privacy protection ( Khademian 2005 ), and generate hi”
- Wicked Problems and Applied Economics (2008, background): “…what facts to gather without first discussing values; thus, it is necessary not only to have many disciplines involved, but also to have interaction with those whose resources and cooperation are indispensable for tackling the problem— that is, with stakeholders (Bueren, Klijn, and Koppenjan 2003).”
- Clearing the air: the contribution of frame analysis to understanding climate policy in the United States (2009, background): “Consequently, ‘more research cannot solve differences in perceptions of the problem and its possible solutions, and it cannot prevent research and its results from being ambiguous and contested’ (Bueren et al. 2003, p. 194).”
- The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems (2013, background): “…network of actors: not only research institutes, but also businesses, government and non-governmental organisations in processes of social learning and knowledge co-creation between scientists and other stakeholders (Leeuwis and Pyburn, 2002; Röling and Wagemakers, 1998; Van Bueren et al., 2003).”
- Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. (2012, background): “The fact that bridging organizations work the least with municipalities who pollute the water most likely contributes to the inability of the region to solve their shared water quality problems (van Bueren et al. 2003, Head 2008).”