Signed Graph Convolutional Networks

By Tyler Derr, Yao Ma, Jiliang Tang. 2018

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Due to the fact much of today's data can be represented as graphs, there has been a demand for generalizing neural network models for graph data. One recent direction that has shown fruitful results, and therefore growing interest, is the usage of graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs). They have been shown to provide a significant improvement on a wide range of tasks in network analysis, one of which being node representation learning. The task of learning low-dimensional node representations has shown to increase performance on a plethora of other tasks from link prediction and node classification, to community detection and visualization. Simultaneously, signed networks (or graphs having both positive and negative links) have become ubiquitous with the growing popularity of social media. However, since previous GCN models have primarily focused on unsigned networks (or graphs consisting of only positive links), it is unclear how they could be applied to signed networks due to the challenges presented by negative links. The primary challenges are based on negative links having not only a different semantic meaning as compared to positive links, but their principles are inherently different and they form complex relations with positive links. Therefore we propose a dedicated and principled effort that utilizes balance theory to correctly aggregate and propagate the information across layers of a signed GCN model. We perform empirical experiments comparing our proposed signed GCN against state-of-the-art baselines for learning node representations in signed networks. More specifically, our experiments are performed on four real-world datasets for the classical link sign prediction problem that is commonly used as the benchmark for signed network embeddings algorithms.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Graph Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Philip S. Yu
  2. Shirui Pan
  3. Zhiyuan Liu
  4. Tao A. Xiang
  5. Marinka Zitnik
  6. Maosong Sun
  7. Jie Zhou
  8. Guodong Long

In Information Systems

  1. Shirui Pan
  2. Maosong Sun
  3. Chengqi Zhang
  4. Zhiyuan Liu
  5. Jiliang Tang
  6. Guodong Long
  7. Dawei Yin
  8. Philip S. Yu

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Shirui Pan
  2. Matthias Fey
  3. Stephan Günnemann
  4. Zhiyuan Liu
  5. Jan Eric Lenssen
  6. Guodong Long
  7. Chengqi Zhang
  8. Stefan Weißenberger

In Graph Learning

  1. Matthias Fey
  2. Shirui Pan
  3. Stephan Günnemann
  4. Johannes Klicpera
  5. Jan Eric Lenssen
  6. Marinka Zitnik
  7. Maosong Sun
  8. Zhiyuan Liu

Citations in the corpus