GETTING PRICES RIGHT: THE IMPACT OF THE MARKET INFORMATION SERVICE IN UGANDA
By Jakob Svensson, David Yanagizawa. 2009
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Media Technology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97fa2b810e24e9d0155dbcef03e23329d967d42b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Media Technology
- Marcel Fafchamps
- Michael Kremer
- B. Minten
- Frank Schilbach
- Raissa Fabregas
- Pierre-Jacques Courtois
- J. Subervie
In Sociology and Political Science
- Marcel Fafchamps
- B. Minten
- Michael Kremer
- Frank Schilbach
- E. Gabre-Madhin
- W. Adger
- Steven N. Durlauf
- John Rand
Citations in the corpus
- Farmer Bargaining Power and Market Information Services (2015, unknown): “Note that we do not consider any bargaining over the quantities sold as do Svensson and Yanagizawa-Drott (2010). Without loss of generality, the price we refer to in the model is the price for buying the entire amount of product o ered by the farmer.”
- Africa human development report 2012: towards a food secure future (2012, unknown): “19 Svensson and Yanagizawa 2008.”
- Impact of SMS-Based Agricultural Information on Indian Farmers (2012, background): “In a related vein, Svensson and Yanagizawa (2009) study the e¤ect of a agricultural price radio broadcast on the spread of market information in Uganda.”
- Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice (2019, result): “Studies in Uganda and Niger recorded similar results for other crops ( 56 – 58 ); delivering price information for staple grains was also found to cause positive effects in Ghana and Peru ( 59 , 60 ).”
- Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches (2020, unknown): “Better information on prices was also observed by Svensson and Yanagizawa (2009) in Uganda to have a positive effect on the level of prices received by farmers.”