Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador

By Melissa Hidrobo, John Hoddinott, Amber Peterman, Amy Margolies, Vanessa Moreira. 2014

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The debate over whether to provide food assistance and the form that this assistance should take has a long history in economics. Despite the ongoing debate, little rigorous evidence exists that compares food assistance in the form of cash versus in-kind. This paper uses a randomized evaluation to assess the impacts and cost-effectiveness of cash, food vouchers, and food transfers. We find that all three modalities significantly improve the quantity and quality of food consumed. However, differences emerge in the types of food consumed, with food transfers leading to significantly larger increases in calories consumed, and vouchers leading to significantly larger increases in dietary diversity.

Subfields: Nutrition and Dietetics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97df1cc847643ca3b04e08c5f081b8a7097534ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

  1. Melissa Hidrobo
  2. Amber Peterman

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Amber Peterman

Citations in the corpus