Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: A review of India's National Solar Mission

By R. Quitzow. 2015

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97d7ca04d6e7d1bc1c92c0858aa4860a40019b6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. F. Kern
3. J. Schleich
4. D. Edmondson
5. Kristin Reichardt
6. Matthew J. Burke
7. J. Stephens
8. David Popp

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. F. Kern
3. J. Schleich
4. D. Edmondson
5. J. Stephens
6. Kristin Reichardt
7. Matthew J. Burke
8. David Popp

Citations in the corpus

• Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions (2017, background): “An empirical assessment of impacts of specific policy instruments is beyond the scope of this paper due to the recent emergence of energy democracy and the complexity of both the policy instruments and the factors influencing the realization of their goals [23].”
• Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “interventions to accelerate transitions may not be occurring at desired rates, is that there is often a lack of coordination between differing instruments for the promotion of sustainability transitions, requiring instead a focus on interactions in diverse ‘policy mixes’ (Kivimaa & Kern 2016; Rogge ”
• A Comprehensive Review on Renewable Energy Development, Challenges, and Policies of Leading Indian States With an International Perspective (2020, background): “through solar energy and by the end of 2022, it has targeted to set up 22000MW of power generation through off-grid and grid-connected plants [130], [203].”
• Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis (2016, background): “…transition and the policy mix promoting solar PV the increasingly global innovation system would imply to not only investigate innovation effects within Germany, but also the interplay with the resulting technological and structural change in foreign countries, such as in China (Quitzow, 2015b).”
• The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions (2019, background): “This undermined the case for supporting the roll-out of (Chinese manufactured) PV modules for actors interested in creating industrial benefits in Germany (Lauber and Jacobsson, 2016; Quitzow, 2015b).”
• Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, background): “Indeed, the resulting inconsistencies may be partly unavoidable and inherent to such transitions (Quitzow, 2015a; Rogge and Reichardt, 2016), but the associated detrimental impact on green innovation may be reduced— at least in the short term—if innovators perceive a strong political commitment and…”
• Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: A critical survey (2017, background): “Within this emerging literature on policy mixes for innovation and sustainability transitions, the importance of considering policy processes has been explicitly acknowledged (Flanagan et al., 2011; Quitzow, 2015; Rogge and Reichardt, 2016; Reichardt et al. 2017).”