Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation

By B. Wicke, P. Verweij, H. van Meijl, D. V. van Vuuren, André P. C. Faaij. 2012

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios (2019, background): “Moreover, ILUC emissions have been shown to be exacerbated by, among others, the production of oil-crop based biofuels, low food and fuel crop yields, and the lack of land protection measures (Wicke et al., 2012; Plevin et al., 2015).”
The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling (2013, background): “Finally, also the potential GHG emissions associated with bio-energy production need to be taken into account (Crutzen et al. 2007; Dornburg et al. 2010; Searchinger et al. 2008; Smeets et al. 2009;Wicke et al. 2012; Wise et al. 2009).”
Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers (2014, background): “Once identified, some risks can be more easily avoided than precisely quantified (Fritsche et al. 2010; Gawel and Ludwig 2011; Wicke et al. 2012).”
Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations (2013, background): “, yields on newly converted land, rate of agricultural intensification, and price-yield elasticity) as well as projections on the location and type of land use changes, resulting production and trade patterns of biomass, price effects and relatedprice elasticity, and the accounting for co-products (”