Causal Inference via Algebraic Geometry: Feasibility Tests for Functional Causal Structures with Two Binary Observed Variables

By Ciarán M. Lee, Robert W. Spekkens. 2015

45 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We provide a scheme for inferring causal relations from uncontrolled statistical data based on tools from computational algebraic geometry, in particular, the computation of Groebner bases. We focus on causal structures containing just two observed variables, each of which is binary. We consider the consequences of imposing different restrictions on the number and cardinality of latent variables and of assuming different functional dependences of the observed variables on the latent ones (in particular, the noise need not be additive). We provide an inductive scheme for classifying functional causal structures into distinct observational equivalence classes. For each observational equivalence class, we provide a procedure for deriving constraints on the joint distribution that are necessary and sufficient conditions for it to arise from a model in that class. We also demonstrate how this sort of approach provides a means of determining which causal parameters are identifiable and how to solve for these. Prospects for expanding the scope of our scheme, in particular to the problem of quantum causal inference, are also discussed.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, History and Philosophy of Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

In History and Philosophy of Science

Citations in the corpus

Improving the accuracy of medical diagnosis with causal machine learning (2020, methodology): “In the ﬁ eld of causal inference, BNs are replaced by the more fundamental Structural Causal Models (SCMs), also referred to as Functional Causal Models and Structural Equation Models 59,62 .”