Paths and consistency in additive cost sharing
By Eric J. Friedman. 2004
75 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Game & Decision Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Qiqi Yan
- Ankur Taly
- Mukund Sundararajan
- Lenon Minorics
- Dominik Janzing
- Hervé Moulin
- Su-In Lee
- Scott M. Lundberg
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Mukund Sundararajan
- Lenon Minorics
- Dominik Janzing
- Hervé Moulin
- Su-In Lee
- Scott M. Lundberg
- Patrick Blöbaum
- Qiqi Yan
In Game & Decision Theory
- Su-In Lee
- Scott M. Lundberg
- Lenon Minorics
- Dominik Janzing
- Patrick Blöbaum
- Hervé Moulin
- Mukund Sundararajan
- Qiqi Yan
Citations in the corpus
- Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks (2017, background): “(For formal defini-Axiomatic tions of the axioms and proof of Proposition 2, see Fried-man (Friedman, 2004).)”
- Learning Explainable Models Using Attribution Priors (2019, methodology): “Since expected gradients is also a diagonal path method, it satisfies the same axioms as integrated gradients [10].”
- Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing (2002, methodology): “(Friedman [1999]) i) A cost sharing method satisfies Dummy, Additivity and Demand Monotonicity if and only if it is an (infinite) convex combination of fixed path methods: [ (fixed path)]”
- Improving performance of deep learning models with axiomatic attribution priors and expected gradients (2020, methodology): “Since EG is also a diagonal path method, it satisfies the same axioms as IG 44 .”
- Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causality problem (2019, methodology): “Integrated gradients can be generalized by integrating over an arbitrary path instead of the straight line. This attribution method is called path method and the following theorem holds. Theorem 1. ((Friedman, 2004, Theorem 1) and (Sundararajan et al., 2017, Theorem 1)) If an attribution method sati”