Best practices in testing and reporting performance of biometric devices.

By A. J. Mansfield, James L. Wayman, D. Rayner, Npl J L Wayman. 2002

438 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97930609f1a5066fd437ed8a4e57abbfb1ae4b12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Anil K. Jain
2. Javier Galbally
3. Julian Fierrez
4. Nalini K. Ratha
5. Sébastien Marcel
6. Ruud M. Bolle
7. Sharath Pankanti
8. J. Connell

Citations in the corpus

• Performance of Biometric Quality Measures (2007, background): “quality measures [4], [13], [16], [17], [23], [24], DETs are the”
• Biometric Antispoofing Methods: A Survey in Face Recognition (2014, methodology): “This type of evaluation is therefore well suited to assess feature-level techniques; (ii) system-based, also known as scenario evaluation [175], designed to evaluate biometric systems as a whole, including the scanner.”
• Guide to Biometrics (2003, methodology): “Further discussion of scenario evaluations can be found in [132].”