How metonymic are metaphors

By Radden Günter. 2002

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9789ae0c0eb667451c5dbcb7de5c26127f022bda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Z. Kövecses
2. Benjamin K. Bergen
3. Joerg Zinken
4. V. Evans
5. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
6. Péter Csatár
7. Rafael E. Núñez
8. Derek M. Jones

In Language and Linguistics

1. Z. Kövecses
2. Benjamin K. Bergen
3. Joerg Zinken
4. V. Evans
5. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
6. Péter Csatár
7. Derek M. Jones
8. Luc Steels

Citations in the corpus

• The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy (2013, background): “Thus, given the example above, we can suggest that metaphor appears to be based on and derive from metonymy (as suggested by Lakoff & Kövecses, 1987, for anger and by other authors; e.g., Barcelona, 2000; Radden, 2002).”
• The cognitive linguistics enterprise: an overview (2007, background): “Indeed, some scholars have begun to suggest that metonymy may be more fundamental to conceptual organization than metaphor (e.g., Taylor, 2003; Radden, 2001), and some have gone so far as to claim that metaphor itself has a metonymic basis (Barcelona, 2001).”