Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational

By Tomas Ståhl, J. Prooijen. 2018

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9785c3762647d1ce57c64f5044b36aa4c832999d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Robbie M. Sutton
2. Karen M. Douglas
3. A. Cichocka
4. J. Uscinski
5. P. Lamberty
6. R. Imhoff
7. J. Pierre
8. M. Hogg

In Social Psychology

1. Robbie M. Sutton
2. Karen M. Douglas
3. A. Cichocka

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Robbie M. Sutton
2. Karen M. Douglas
3. A. Cichocka
4. J. Uscinski
5. T. Nefes
6. Farzin Deravi
7. Chee Siang Ang
8. P. Lamberty

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding Conspiracy Theories (2019, background): “For example, Swami (2012) asked a sample of Malaysian participants to complete a scale of conspiracy belief, a scale specifically concerning anti-Jewish conspiracy theories (e.”
• Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories (2020, unknown): “…2018; Newheiser, Farias, & Tausch, 2011; van Prooijen & Acker, 2015); “bullshit receptivity” and lack of analytic thinking (Hart & Graether, 2018; Ståhl & van Prooijen, 2018; Swami et al., 2014); and paranoia/schizotypy (Dagnall et al., 2015; Darwin, Neave, & Holmes, 2011; Grzesiak-Feldman &…”