In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions

By Kristen Shinohara, Jacob O. Wobbrock. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Occupational Therapy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/976f969b05b5c61e1e7b5a9490a080268e469bd4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Jon E. Froehlich

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Meredith Ringel Morris
2. Jon E. Froehlich
3. Leah Findlater

In Occupational Therapy

1. Jeffrey P. Bigham

Citations in the corpus

• What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019 (2021, background): “1% (N=46) of papers aimed to address the disability community in general, including investigations of assistive technology [135], interviews with disability activists [91], and accessibility adherence/knowledge across professions [106, 123].”
• Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments (2015, background): “P6 and P7 liked it, saying that they want to be aware of anything that a sighted person is [27].”
• Visual challenges in the everyday lives of blind people (2013, background): “To many working in the accessibility field this may not come as a surprise, but it is well-documented that everyday issues like social perception are too often ignored in the design of access technologies [26].”
• Hands Holding Clues for Object Recognition in Teachable Machines (2019, background): “However, they often come with other limitations such as the need for crowd availability and Internet connection, per demand cost, and privacy concerns [3, 61, 71].”