Nearly Kähler 6-Manifolds with Reduced Holonomy
By F. Belgun, Andrei Moroianu. 2001
74 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97658eba3629c2848ca70f77fda1221c1d4b365a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Geometry and Topology
Citations in the corpus
- Maximally homogeneous para-CR manifolds of semisimple type (2006, unknown): “er manifold. Then ∇ψ± = 0 in other words the Nijenhuis tensor of J is parallel w.r.t the canonical Hermitian connection. This has been proved first by Kirichenko [43] and a short proof can be found in [5]. It also follows from our Theorem 3.1, which is unifying this type of property in the class G1. ”
- Almost parallel structures (2001, background): “Any 6-dimensional strictly nearlyKähler manifold has a canonical connection with holonomy SU(3), and this reduces to U(2) if and only if M fibres over a self-dual Einstein 4-manifold (Belgun and Morioanu, 2000).”
- Homogeneous nearly K\"{a}hler manifolds (2006, background): “Next, in the 70’s [22, 25] and more recently (we mention, as a very incomplete list of references on the topic: [38, 6, 35] and [36]), nearly Khler manifolds have been studied for themselves.”
- Nearly Kaehler geometry and Riemannian foliations (2002, background): “We recall now that ∇(∇J) = 0, a fact proven in [1], which is equivalent to”
- On Nearly-Kähler Geometry (2002, methodology): “2 was already proven in 6-dimensions by a different method in [2].”