The What, Why and How of Primate Taxonomy

By C. Groves. International journal of primatology, 2004

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Ecology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9765602b7e4bca12387b81bd313fd4c0dc4d9701

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. Laura K. Marsh
2. A. Rylands
3. R. Mittermeier
4. J. Fuerst

In Ecology

1. Laura K. Marsh
2. A. Rylands
3. R. Mittermeier
4. J. Fuerst
5. R. Frankham
6. K. Ralls
7. R. Lacy
8. J. Ganzhorn

In Social Psychology

1. R. Mittermeier
2. A. Rylands
3. Laura K. Marsh
4. J. Fuerst
5. Ian Tattersall
6. C. Groves

Citations in the corpus

• Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity (2012, background): “those lessening DNA sequencing costs) and increased effort lead to increased resolution among lineages, such that even individuals within populations can be diagnosably different (Avise and Ball, 1990; Groves, 2004; Winkler, 2010).”
• Lemur Diversity in Madagascar (2008, background): “Groves (2001, 2004) and Tattersall (2007) discussed many of the issues involved in the taxonomic classification of the primates, and the latter author presented contrasting viewpoints for the lemurs in particular.”
• A Taxonomic Revision of the Saki Monkeys, Pithecia Desmarest, 1804 (2014, methodology): “…status until evidence is provided to delineate Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Neotropical-Primates on 31 Oct 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use Neotropical Primates 21(1), July 2014 9 them further (Winston, 1999; Van Roosmalen et al., 2002; Groves, 2004, pers. comm.).”
• The Wayward Dog: Is the Australian native dog or Dingo a distinct species? (2017, background): “Accordingly, while some of the present authors have advocated a strict use of the PSC in mammal taxonomy (Groves, 2001, 2004; Groves & Grubb 2011; Jackson & Groves 2015), for several reasons the present issue warrants a nuanced approach.”
• The Systematics and Distributions of the Marmosets (Callithrix, Callibella, Cebuella, and Mico) and Callimico (Callimico) (Callitrichidae, Primates) (2009, background): “For this reason, to avoid paraphyly, neither Cebuella nor Callibella should be recognized as distinct genera, unless Mico (for the Amazonian Argentata-group marmosets) is as well (Groves 2004).”
• The Diversity of the New World Primates (Platyrrhini): An Annotated Taxonomy (2009, methodology): “Although closely related to the Amazonian marmosets, we believe that Cebuella pygmaea should be maintained in a separate genus (see Groves 2004; Rylands et al. 2000, Rylands, Mittermeier and Coimbra-Filho in press).”
• The Nature of Race (2015, background): “at which it becomes worthwhile to give them a scientific name" (Groves, 2004).”
• Taxonomic review of the New World tamarins (Primates: Callitrichidae) (2016, background): “fuscicollis by Hershkovitz (1977), be considered species.”