Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge*
By D. Osman, C. Ridel, P. Ray, X. Monnet, N. Anguel, C. Richard, J. Teboul. Critical Care Medicine, 2007
658 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/974fc7a969f57610b6c1fbcdebe8307d0f44f0b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
In Epidemiology
- R. Bellomo
- R. Cavallazzi
- P. Marik
- John A. Kellum
- A. Rhodes
- Laura Evans
- Janice L. Zimmerman
- Mitchell M. Levy
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group (2012, methodology): “Traditional methods based on clinical examination and static measurements of right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures are of questionable accuracy in predicting volume responsiveness and should be used with caution [49-53].”
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 (2007, background): “and cardiac function, potential benefits of such information may be confounded by differences in interpretation of results (170–172), lack of correlation of pulmonary artery occlusion pressures with clinical response (173), and absence of a proven strategy to use catheter results to improve patient ”
- Does the Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness? An Updated Meta-Analysis and a Plea for Some Common Sense* (2013, positive): “Characteristics of the Studies Included in Meta-Analysis Author Year Patients No. of Patients Method Inclusion Criteria Mechanical Ventilation Other Comparator Challenge r-ΔSV Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ICU Calvin et al (23) 1981 Various 28 PAC SV N — 250 cc Colloid 0.16 —”
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 (2017, background): “Although insertion of a PA catheter may provide useful information regarding volume status and cardiac function, these benefits may be confounded by differences in interpretation of the results (413, 414), poor correlation of PA occlusion pressures with clinical response (415), and lack of a PA cath”