The Correlates of Discord: Identity, Issue Alignment, and Political Hostility in Polarized America

By Lori D. Bougher. 2017

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9746928aa70dc7a14b7ab27cbc2b62c30627e41a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Yanna Krupnikov
2. James N. Druckman
3. Yphtach Lelkes

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Yanna Krupnikov
2. Yphtach Lelkes
3. Samara Klar
4. John Ryan
5. James N. Druckman
6. Matthew Levendusky

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Yanna Krupnikov
2. Samara Klar
3. John Ryan
4. James N. Druckman
5. Matthew Levendusky
6. Yphtach Lelkes
7. Kevin Arceneaux
8. Thomas J. Leeper

Citations in the corpus

• (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization (2021, background): “In turn, these perceptions about the ideological distribution of the opposing party will fuel greater affective polarization (Bougher 2017; Rogowski and Sutherland 2016).”
• Affective Polarization and Ideological Sorting: A Reciprocal, Albeit Weak, Relationship (2018, methodology): “…drives affective polarization (Iyengar and Westwood 2015; e.g. Iyengar, Sood, and Lelkes 2012; Mason 2015, 2016), other work claims that increasing ideological sorting and elite polarization in the mass public is to blame (Rogowski and Sutherland 2016; Bougher 2017; Webster and Abramowitz 2017).”