Assessing the credibility of instrumental variables inference with imperfect instruments via sensitivity analysis
By Richard A. Ashley. 2009
53 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Electrochemistry, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/972d5dd9217c11ce390cebf3d3d6d3fbc4575005
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- A. Rosen
- Aviv Nevo
- K. Sudhir
- S. Meza
- Günter J. Hitsch
- Pradeep Chintagunta
- Frank Verboven
- Anindya Ghose
In Electrochemistry
In Statistics and Probability
- Aviv Nevo
- A. Rosen
- D. Chetverikov
- Ivan A. Canay
- A. Chesher
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Kengo Kato
- Donald W. K. Andrews
Citations in the corpus
- The Efficacy of Shareholder Voting: Evidence from Equity Compensation Plans (2012, unknown): “In particular, we follow the partial identification approach outlined by Ashley (2009) to examine the sensitivity of”
- Identification With Imperfect Instruments (2008, methodology): “) For research on the implications of instrument invalidity in the linear model, outside the study of treatment effects, see, for example, Ashley (2009), Hahn and Hausman (2003), Berkowitz, Caner, and Fang (2008), Conley, Hansen, and Rossi (2006), and Kraay (2008).”
- Quasi-Experiments and Hedonic Property Value Methods (2009, unknown): “Uz(y − θ, z, ζ)− Ux(y − θ, z, ζ) · θz(z) = 0, (2)”
- Beyond plausibly exogenous (2018, unknown): “1 Alternative approaches to dealing with violations of the exclusion restriction include Ashley (2009), Berkowitz et al. (2012), Flores and Flores-Lagunes (2012), Hahn and Hausman (2002), Jones (2015), Kang et al.”