T-Duality: Topology Change from H-Flux
By P. Bouwknegt, Jarah Evslin, Varghese Mathai. 2003
297 citations recorded by the source corpus.
T-duality acts on circle bundles by exchanging the first Chern class with the fiberwise integral of the H-flux, as we motivate using E8 and also using S-duality. We present known and new examples including NS5-branes, nilmanifolds, lens spaces, both circle bundles over Pn, and the AdS5×S5 to AdS5×P2×S1 with background H-flux of Duff, Lü and Pope. When T-duality leads to M-theory on a non-spin manifold the gravitino partition function continues to exist due to the background flux, however the known quantization condition for G4 receives a correction. In a more general context, we use correspondence spaces to implement isomorphisms on the twisted K-theories and twisted cohomology theories and to study the corresponding Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem. Interestingly, in the case of decomposable twists, both twisted theories admit fusion products and so are naturally rings.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97226641298095a92261d0d4c12e46e0ab31a79d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
In Mathematical Physics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Citations in the corpus
- A scan for new N = 1 vacua on twisted tori (2006, background): “) The second relation is the well–known inversion of the radius; the first implies, by taking d on both sides (nothing depends on x1), that ι∂x1H ↔ c1 [68–70].”
- New aspects of the ddc-lemma (2005, unknown): “Namely, in order for a torus bundle (E,H) to be T-dualizable, H(X,Y, ·) has to vanish for every pair of vertical vectors X and Y [8].”
- New aspects of the dd c -lemma (2004, methodology): “Namely, in order for a torus bundle (E,H) to be T-dualizable, H(X,Y, ·) has to vanish for every pair of vertical vectors X and Y [8].”
- Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review (2005, unknown): “[156, 157] for constructions relevant to this discussion).”
- Mirror Symmetric SU(3)-Structure Manifolds with NS Fluxes (2003, background): “This fact played for example a role in a number of applications and was recently formalized in mathematical terms in [11].”
- T-duality, generalized geometry and non-geometric backgrounds (2008, background): “It is well known that, under a single T-duality, the components of the B-field with no legs along the T-dualized directions stay unchanged, while those with one leg are exchanged with the connection along the T-dualized fiber [26].”
- Lectures on nongeometric flux compactifications (2007, background): “It is worth pointing out here that these fluxes have been studied from a more rigorous mathematical standpoint than we take here [49], where it is argued that the presence of R flux corresponds to some kind of nonassociative geometry.”
- Hamiltonian Symmetries and Reduction in Generalized Geometry (2005, methodology): “Another very interesting example of twisting change accompanied with topology change is the T -duality with H-flux as described by Bouwknegt, et al [3].”
- Generalized complex geometry and T-duality (2011, methodology): “Proposition 2.1 (Bouwknegt–Hannabuss–Mathai [6]).”
- Generalized Complex Geometry (2004, methodology): “This construction is described in the physics literature and especially in the remarkable paper of Bouwknegt, Evslin, and Mathai [7].”