Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences

By D. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, Mark W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, WILLIAM H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. Fay and 6 more. 2000

1,330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/970ba9b19b56a234281fd3f25e081f0f078c5d45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Phylogenetic Relationships of the Perianthless Piperales: Reconstructing the Evolution of Floral Development (2004, positive): “N-nc18S-6, N-nc18S-7 (Soltis et al. 1997); rbcL–32F (59-TTGGATTCAAAGTCGGTGTT-39; M. Chase, unpublished data) and 1352R (59-AAGCAGCAGCTAGTTCCGGACTCC-39; L. Prince, unpublished data); and atpB–atpBS 2, atpBS 1494R, atpBS 611, and atpBS766R (Hoot et al. 1995).”
Early Cretaceous Archaefructus eoflora sp. nov. with Bisexual Flowers from Beipiao, Western Liaoning, China (2004, methodology): “morphological character states (Doyle and Endress, 2000) and 1628 molecular sequences of three genes (Soltis et al., 2000) of living seed plants.”
Photosynthetic pathways in Bromeliaceae: phylogenetic and ecological significance of CAM and C3 based on carbon isotope ratios for 1893 species (2015, background): “…to Typhaceae (including Sparganiaceae) and, together, these two families represent the earliest diverging lineage of Poales sensu APG III (Davis, 1995; Soltis et al., 2000; Givnish et al., 2004, 2007, 2010; APG III, 2009; BouchenakKhelladi, Muasaya & Linder, 2014; Magallón et al., 2015).”
Phylogeny and Historical Biogeography of Geraniaceae in Relation to Climate Changes and Pollination Ecology (2008, background): “The Geraniaceae are included in the order Geraniales along with the families Francoaceae, Greyiaceae, Ledocarpaceae, Melianthaceae and Vivianiaceae (Soltis et al. 2000; APG II 2003).”
Dark and disturbed: a new image of early angiosperm ecology (2004, background): “By providing a more open path for water moving through the stem, vessels allow a given amount of leaf area to be supported at lower shoot construction cost, as found especially in basal angiosperm understory lianas (Brodribb and Feild 2000; Feild et al. 2000, 2003a; Sperry 2003).”
Evolution of Microsporogenesis in Angiosperms (2002, methodology): “It falls among the basal angiosperms, sometimes as sister to the eudicots (Soltis et al. 1999, 2000) or sometimes as sister to the monocotyledons (Qiu et al. 1999, 2000), although neither placement is well supported.”
Review of the systematics of Scrophulariaceae s.l. and their current disposition (2006, background): “The monophyly of the Lamiales (Olmstead et al. 1993, 2001; Oxelman et al. 1999; Backlund et al. 2000; Soltis et al. 2000; Albach et al. 2001; Bremer et al. 2002; Hilu et al. 2003) and many of the families comprising the order are well established (Scotland et al. 1995; Smith et al. 1997a; Wagstaff…”
Aluminum hyperaccumulation in angiosperms: A review of its phylogenetic significance (2002, background): “Rubiaceae take the most basal position within the Gentianales (e.g., Olmstead et al., 1993; Backlund et al., 2000; Soltis et al., 2000) and probably contain the largest number of aluminum-hyperaccumulating species of any family.”
The cleistogamous breeding system: A review of its frequency, evolution, and ecology in angiosperms (2007, methodology): “We did this for three comprehensive, family-based angiosperm phylogenies derived from 18S rDNA, rbcL and atpB sequences (Soltis et al., 2000), matK sequences (Hilu et al., 2003), and a supertree generated from 27 source trees from published and unpublished studies (Soltis et al., 2005).”
Phylogenetics, divergence times and diversification from three genomic partitions in monocots (2015, background): “…were unavailable and/or did not amplify; estimations of familial relationships using similar procedures have shown that such substitutions have not had adverse effects on phylogenetic studies at higher taxonomic levels as these families are monophyletic (Qiu et al., 1999; Soltis et al., 2000).”
RECONSTRUCTING THE PHYLOGENY OF LEGUMES (LEGUMINOSAE): AN EARLY 21 ST CENTURY PERSPECTIVE (2003, background): “The threegene analyses of Soltis et al. (2000) showed Fabales to be one of four well-supported subclades (along with Rosales, Cucurbitales, and Fagales) of a larger clade, nested within Eurosid I, a clade comprising all angiosperms that form symbiotic associations with nitrogen-fixing bacteria…”