A Contemporary Integrative Interpersonal Theory of Personality Disorders.

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

DSM-5 and the Path Toward Empirically Based and Clinically Useful Conceptualization of Personality and Psychopathology (2014, unknown): “…Authors from various theoretical perspectives have emphasized the importance of distinguishing diagnostic severity, or the overall level of personality pathology, from the stylistic manner with which that severity is expressed (Livesley & Jang, 2000; Parker et al., 2004; Pincus, 2005; Tyrer, 2005).”
Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. (2010, background): “D ow nl oa de d fr om a rj ou rn al s. an nu al re vi ew s. or g by U ni ve rs ity o f B er ge n U N IV E R SI T E T SB IB L IO T E K T o n 01 /0 4/ 10 .”
Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. (2009, background): “Many clinical investigators propose that personality pathology is often expressed through disturbed interpersonal relations (e.g., Benjamin, 1996; Pincus, 2005).”
Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, background): “a memory of someone else, a different aspect of the self) (Pincus, 2005; see also Back et al., 2011; Wessels et al., 2016).”