Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An exploration of the well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour (2013, background): “Indeed, Vittersø and Søholt (2011) proposed that eudaimonic activities are often unrelated to, and sometimes negatively related with positive pleasant feeling states, such as vitality.”
Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing (2012, background): “Ryan and Huta admitted that SWB can be a good indicator of wellness, but only when considered in the context of the functions, values, and behaviours that engender it, which is to say, when it is considered in conjunction with eudaimonia.”
Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace (2012, background): “A series of previous studies have supported these assumptions (Vittersø, 2011; Vittersø et al., 2010; Vittersø, Oelmann, & Wang, 2009; Vittersø, Overwien, et al., 2009; Vittersø & Søholt, 2011).”