Security Challenges in the IP-based Internet of Things
By T. Heer, Óscar García-Morchón, René Hummen, Sye Loong Keoh, Sandeep S. Kumar, Klaus Wehrle. Wireless personal communications, 2011
402 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/970698bf0a66ddf935b14e433c81e1175c0e8307
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Shahid Raza
- Zheng Yan
- Athanasios V. Vasilakos
- Brij Bhooshan Gupta
- Peng Zhang
- Thiemo Voigt
- Syed Ali Hassan
- Ekram Hossain
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Ekram Hossain
- Li D. Xu
- Marimuthu Swami Palaniswami
- Thiemo Voigt
- Zheng Yan
- Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
- Syed Ali Hassan
- Rajkumar Buyya
Citations in the corpus
- Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions (2012, background): “[54] T.”
- Denial-of-Service detection in 6LoWPAN based Internet of Things (2013, background): “Garcia, et. al., [7], [8] presented the SotA about the threats and possible countermeasures for IP-based WSNs.”
- Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Research: A Review of Current Research Topics (2019, background): “If this occurs, resources will be exhausted and smart devices may shut down [7], [45].”
- The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues (2014, background): “To ensure security of data, services and entire IoT system, a series of properties, such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, authorization, non-repudiation, availability, and privacy, must be guaranteed [228,229].”
- Lithe: Lightweight Secure CoAP for the Internet of Things (2013, background): “Recently, the community has presented works on analyzing security challenges in the IP-based IoT [6] and solutions that improve or modify standard IP security protocols for the requirements of resource-constrained devices.”
- Towards an Analysis of Security Issues, Challenges, and Open Problems in the Internet of Things (2015, background): “Disaster recovery mechanisms are important to implement here [15], [16], [17].”
- Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions (2018, background): “In general, IIoT is a resource-constrained communication network which largely relies on low-bandwidth channels for communication among lightweight devices regarding CPU, memory, and energy consumption [102].”
- Internet of Things: Security vulnerabilities and challenges (2015, background): “The user that controls the gateway can be fooled into running executable active-x scripts which could result in a complete system shut down or data theft [35].”
- A Survey of IoT-Enabled Cyberattacks: Assessing Attack Paths to Critical Infrastructures and Services (2018, background): “The inter-connectivity capabilities of IoT technologies, along with their inherent computational constraints [55], are unfortunately sufficient conditions that enable various attack vectors against critical systems and services.”
- A survey on trust management for Internet of Things (2014, background): “Heer et al. (2011) discussed the applicability and limitations of existing Internet protocols and security architectures in the context of IoT.”
- Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges (2019, background): “tampering with information, and range of other malicious activities [81].”
- Security and Privacy in the Internet of Things (2017, background): “Designing appropriately secure and robust systems is challenging, since communication between nodes is often over ‘lossy and low-bandwidth channels’ (Heer et al. 2011).”
- Privacy in the Internet of Things: threats and challenges (2014, neutral): “45, 46] [2, 3, 41, 46] [3, 13, 41, 46] [2, 3, 42, 47] [2, 3, 47] [3, 48, 49, 50] [41, 50]”
- Security and privacy challenges in industrial Internet of Things (2015, background): “There are many differences between classical IT systems and CPPS [44, 18, 74, 71].”