A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life.

By Daniel P. Sulmasy. The gerontologist, 2002

805 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96f5b61b75cb079ca4ac41075bed2e9afaed5827

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. R. Neimeyer
2. C. Puchalski

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. H. Chochinov
2. R. Neimeyer
3. C. Puchalski

In Social Psychology

1. R. Neimeyer
2. C. Puchalski

Citations in the corpus

• Improving the Spiritual Dimension of Whole Person Care: Reaching National and International Consensus (2014, neutral): “28 In 2004, the U.S. National Consensus Project developed eight required domains of care, among which spiritual, religious, and existential issues are included.”
• Improving the Quality of Spiritual Care as a Dimension of Palliative Care: The Report of the Consensus Conference (2009, positive): “The work of Engel 31 and White 32 proposed a biopsycho-social model for care that can readily be extended to encompass the spiritual 29 (Fig.”
• Roles for Psychologists in End-of-Life Care: Emerging Models of Practice. (2003, background): “With its attention to psychological and behavioral factors, the biopsychosocial (or biopsychosocial–spiritual) model underlies and guides the creative and vital role that psychologists can play in preventing disease, enhancing health, and improving care at the end of life (Sulmasy, 2002).”