Common Morality: Deciding What to Do

By B. Gert. 2004

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96f4ece4fbd7d860300f5b9fcfb980cea45b15d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Kristin Smith-Crowe
2. Justin F. Landy
3. Danielle E. Warren
4. Jared Piazza

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Kristin Smith-Crowe
2. Justin F. Landy
3. Danielle E. Warren
4. Jared Piazza

In Philosophy

1. Kristin Smith-Crowe
2. Justin F. Landy
3. Danielle E. Warren
4. Jared Piazza

Citations in the corpus

• Deciding what's right: The role of external sanctions and embarrassment in shaping moral judgments in the workplace (2008, background): “From this list, Gert (2004) suggested that secondary rules can be formulated.”
• “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments (2013, background): “While some forms of deontology allow for rules to be overridden when the benefits of doing so clearly outweigh the disutility (e.g., see Gert, 2004), strict forms of deontology argue for an absolutist or non-negotiable commitment to rules, or “protected” (Baron & Spranca, 1997) or “sacred” values…”