Degenerating the complex hyperbolic ideal triangle groups

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Traces in Complex Hyperbolic Triangle Groups (2004, methodology): “He proved that an ideal triangle group representation is a discrete embedding if and only if cos α 6 61 64. In [ Sch01a ] he also used the”
COMPLEX HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY OF THE FIGURE EIGHT KNOT (2013, background): “Indeed, Schwartz showed in [17] that the Whitehead link complement admits a uniformizable spherical CR structure, and in [18] he found an example of a closed hyperbolic manifold that arises as the boundary of a complex hyperbolic surface.”
Spherical CR Geometry and Dehn Surgery (2007, background): “The geometry of this group is discussed in [10] and in Chapters 20 and 21 of the book under review.”
Real hyperbolic on the outside, complex hyperbolic on the inside (2003, background): “The domain of Ψ is S 3 −[ E0 K ]−[ E∞ K ] and the range is the flat cylinder R/2π Z × Z .W e discussed Ψ in detail in [S1] and [ S2 ], where we called it the elevation map.”
Complex hyperbolic triangle groups (2003, methodology): “I also use hybrid cones in [17], to construct a natural fundamental domain in the domain of discontinuity ∆(L) for the last ideal triangle group L.”