The past, present and potential for microfluidic reactor technology in chemical synthesis.

By K. Elvira, Xavier Casadevall i Solvas, R. Wootton, Andrew deMello. Nature Chemistry, 2013

1,071 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96cf70294ad9a0f90fe28867ad49fd37ca89a0be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. C. Hansen
2. Richard M. Maceiczyk
3. R. Wootton
4. D. Di Carlo
5. D. Chiu
6. Patrick Doyle
7. Molly M. Stevens
8. Andrew deMello

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. C. Hansen
2. Andrew deMello
3. Philip D. Howes
4. T. P. Lagus
5. Jon F. Edd

Citations in the corpus

• Small but Perfectly Formed? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Microfluidics in the Chemical and Biological Sciences (2017, background): “For example, rapid mixing using segmented flows, multistep chemistry, and integrated separation steps make microfluidics a powerful platform for synthesizing a wide variety of nanomaterials, where particle shape, size, and size distributions can be controlled with unrivalled precision.(58) Significa”
• Colloidal nanoparticles as advanced biological sensors (2014, background): “Given the extremely low reaction volumes, rapid throughput, and real-time tuning of product properties in continuous-flow formats, these systems can yield a large amount of information for relatively low inputs of reagents, time, and energy (22).”