Population responses by Orius insidiosus to vegetational diversity

By J. Lundgren, Kris A. G. Wyckhuys, N. Desneux. BioControl (Dordrecht), 2009

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/967a7e3d39f44cc0b7b197c028a89b042dd6c088

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Alexandre Bout
2. R. Boll
3. N. Desneux
4. P. Parolin
5. C. Poncet
6. C. Bresch
7. R. Brun

In Insect Science

1. Alexandre Bout
2. R. Boll
3. N. Desneux
4. P. Parolin
5. C. Poncet
6. C. Bresch
7. R. Brun

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control (2009, unknown): “For example, Orius insidiosus chooses to lay eggs on non-crop plants whose characteristics facilitate the development of their progeny (Lundgren et al., 2008, 2009); the predatory heteropteran Geocoris punctipes also lays its eggs preferentially on specific cropland weeds (Naranjo and Stimac, 1987).”
• Secondary plants used in biological control: A review (2012, background): “However, it is not vegetational diversity per se which serves as a tool for conserving natural enemies in agricultural landscapes and enhances their potential as biological control agents (Landis et al. 2000; Lundgren et al. 2009): different secondary plants fulfill different specific functions with”