Scaling of lunge‐feeding performance in rorqual whales: mass‐specific energy expenditure increases with body size and progressively limits diving capacity

By J. Goldbogen, John Calambokidis, D. Croll, Megan F. McKenna, Erin M. Oleson, J. Potvin, N. Pyenson, G. Schorr, R. Shadwick, B. Tershy. 2012

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96721da6381d5bcc36b0089fc73a7e6d281a136b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Ari S. Friedlaender

In Atmospheric Science

1. John Calambokidis
2. J. Goldbogen
3. Ari S. Friedlaender
4. A. Stimpert
5. Douglas Nowacek
6. B. Southall
7. S. DeRuiter
8. E. Hazen

In Ecology

1. Ari S. Friedlaender
2. John Calambokidis
3. J. Goldbogen
4. Douglas Nowacek
5. A. Stimpert
6. B. Southall
7. Andrew J. Read
8. S. DeRuiter

Citations in the corpus

• Prey density and distribution drive the three‐dimensional foraging strategies of the largest filter feeder (2015, methodology): “After a lunge, there is relatively little fluking as the water is purged from the expanded oropharyngeal cavity (Goldbogen et al. 2012).”
• Extreme diel variation in the feeding behavior of humpback whales along the western Antarctic Peninsula during autumn (2013, background): “Their lunging feeding behavior is energetically costly because it in - volves a series of high-energy locomotor maneuvers to accomplish (Acevedo-Gutiérrez et al. 2002, Potvin et al. 2009, Goldbogen et al. 2012).”