An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics

By Scott M. Thompson, Linkan Bian, Nima Shamsaei, Aref Yadollahi. 2015

1,210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/966665fd676227e4d6a67f3f00f56980bb1e9a40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: Challenges and opportunities (2017, methodology): “These types of AMmethods can be classified in two main categories: (i) laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), in which a bed of powder serves as the feeding system, such as selective laser melting (SLM), and (ii) direct laser deposi- tion (DLD), which employs a blown powder system, such as laser engineere”
A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes (2017, background): “For instance, ‘‘because the ultimate mechanical behavior of metallic parts is related to their thermalhistory-dependent microstructure, additive manufactured (AM) parts can have different, more anisotropic properties than wrought materials” (quote from [1]).”
Material-structure-performance integrated laser-metal additive manufacturing (2021, neutral): “Laser-controlled solidification is completed by three major events of heterogeneous nucleation of melt, grain growth andmicrostructure development, andmushy-zone heat/mass transfer and densification (151, 152).”
Additive manufacturing: Challenges, trends, and applications (2019, background): “These complexities were mainly caused due to the presence of several process parameters, including laser power, transverse speed, powder feed rate, layer thickness, scanning strategy, and build orientation.(52) He et al.”
Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part I: The effects of powder feedstock, manufacturing, and post-process conditions on the resulting microstructure and defects (2020, background): “Additive manufacturing (AM), as opposed to traditional reductive manufacturing such as milling, turning and drilling, can build near-net-shaped parts from the “bottom-up” in a layer-by-layer fashion as guided by a computer-aided drawing (CAD) model [1,2].”
Effects of building orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel (2017, background): “(a) Schematic of SLM process [1], (b) SEM image of 17-4 PH SS powder used i”
Anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A critical review (2018, methodology): “Generic illustration of a PBF AM system [32].”
Metal Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing: A Literature Review (2020, background): “Direct energy deposition [20, 45-55]  Large build volume possible  Graded materials capability  Good mechanical properties  Ability to build on or repair parts  High cost (both machine depreciation and operation)  Low resolution  Significant residual stress  Relatively rough surface”